ripple logo
Search_label2
Log In   |   Join RIPPLE
Email
Password
 
 
Not a RIPPLE member? Learn more and join here.
Az_carmen_pic Should Native American People Buy Back Their Lands?

Weary of promises unfulfilled, Native American tribes and nations are buying back the land of their ancestors. Waiting on the United States government to make good on the promises of treaties, or the outcome of court cases, regarding land holdings has allowed developers and others to desecrate sacred places. Realizing they can wait no longer if they are to protect their cultures and traditions, native tribes are focusing their efforts and utilizing their resources to back buy traditional lands.

A mere 840,000 acres of traditional land has been re-acquired in the last twenty years. To put this in perspective, consider that the smallest state in the United States is Rhode Island and this is roughly the amount of land that Indian tribes and nations have been able to re-obtain through purchase. There is no way to determine how much land was promised to tribal peoples through treaty. However it is known that the land that settlers and others obtained through wholesale land give-aways equated to the loss of millions of acres of land holdings that were critical to the cultures and traditions of Indian peoples.

To underscore the reality of what losing their land means to native nations and tribes, Dr. David G. Lewis, the Cultural Resource Manager of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, stated, “The land is the basis of all of our culture and spirituality. Having the land back allows us to conduct our spiritual practices in an appropriate fashion and to maintain our traditions. Without the land it is difficult to live a Native lifestyle.”





Waiting for the return of the land through the US court system takes time, and waiting is not seen as an option for many Native American leaders. Chairwoman Sue Shaffer, of the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, understood the critical need to re-acquire tribal lands thirty years ago. In response to a question I recently posed to her regarding the tribe’s land holding, her response was this, “All of the land that you see that the Cow Creeks have, has been purchased back by us. Nothing has been given to us. Nothing! Not one square inch! We earned it all ourselves.” An enlightened leader, Chairwoman Shaffer understands how important it is to her tribe to own the traditional lands as a means for the tribe to sustain itself, its cultural identity, its traditions, and ultimately, the long term welfare of its people.

Weary but undaunted, Native Americans are buying back their lands to ensure survival. Tired and sick at heart, Indians have had to watch as developers bought up huge tracts of land to pander to the interests of those who would defame sacred places. Unwilling to endure this sight any longer, they have marshaled their resources and are preserving their cultures through reacquisition of their traditional lands. It is not too late.



See all posts by Az Carmen D. Ed., Enrolled Chickasaw Nation.

13
COMMENTS
Nicolette Yelverton says
12.29.09 // 12:07 PM
Native American's should buy back their lands, this is exactly what Indian Self Determination is all about. Buying the land back ensures that it is truly ours, and that in itself is very sacred. Az Carmen, I appreciate that you focused on a topic that many tribes dare to dream about.
Ev Evans says
12.29.09 // 12:14 PM
It seems that social justice would dictate that the lands be gifted back to the tribes with an apology!
Kelly Warren says
12.29.09 // 12:26 PM
I agree with Nicolette. Purchasing the land for ourselves ensures that it is ours. Use the system to work FOR you not AGAINST you.
Christi Browning says
12.29.09 // 06:24 PM
In lieu of social justice, yes, buy back the land. Why wait any longer for the government to keep its promises?
Kathi Jaworski says
12.31.09 // 11:21 AM
Great article! The more I learn about the history of U.S. relations with Native Americans, the more I believe that tribal land re-acquisition is something we all should support. Yes, it's about social justice, and about desperately needed poverty alleviation. It's also about more universal benefits. Strong indigenous communities and land-based cultures remind us all that while our time on earth is short, how we choose to live today has impact for generations. We need this perspective to be alive and well in our society.
Jack Davis says
01. 4.10 // 09:43 AM
Hard to understand the question without some definition of "their lands". Wasn't the entire continent, at one time, "their lands"? I certainly believe that "sacred lands" should be preserved. But what are "sacred lands"? Where would the lines be drawn? Is it even possible to go back in time and , if so, how far? What if the lands in question encompass a town or city? Purchasing those lands in an open market would make these questions moot in my view. The sale should not be forced....unless, perhaps, the land in question is of a sacred nature. Then, perhaps, it should be preserved by law, no matter the ownership. But, again, what is "sacred land"?
Az Carmen says
01. 4.10 // 11:39 AM
We do what we can with the money we have. Buying back the land doesn't mean the wholesale repurchase of two continents, it just means some NDN folks are not waiting and are back buying the land that is available to them. And as to sacred lands, all lands of the People are sacred.
Alonna Soderberg says
01. 4.10 // 02:03 PM
I am so glad you posted about this, Az! It seems so often that the government wants to be seen as the hero; 'giving' back something that was rightfully the NA's. However it goes so much deeper than that for me. It starts at the root of all of us - childhood and our environment. Schools are still teaching Christopher Columbus as a Traveling Hero, these children will be our future leaders and government officials. Unless we teach otherwise, it seems a never ending battle. I did not learn any other way than him "discovering America" until College level courses. That needs to change. I also agree with what Nicolette says. This is a chance to show the Government that the NA's can do better than the gov. did, they will take the high road. The high road is always bittersweet.
Joyce Y Stoneman says
01. 4.10 // 02:47 PM
The taking of native land didn't start in the "new world". I have traced ancestors back to Ireland and Scotland whose houses and belonging were either stolen or burned while they were put on ships and sent to Canada. Their stolen land was then used to raise sheep.Yes we still have lots of work that needs to be done. I am also of Native American ancestry .
Stephen Jenkins says
01.10.10 // 01:27 PM
re: Sacred Places Reminds of part of a poem by Wendell Berry: There are no unsacred places; there are only sacred places and desecrated places
Az Carmen says
01.25.10 // 02:14 PM
Steve you are so right! How are you cousin? Glad you are reading ripplenw.org. Great site to share information re: NDNZ. Anytime you want to post, just fb or email me!
Kyle Bussey says
05.14.10 // 10:35 PM
Just watched a PBS episode "The Carbon Hunters". Back in the 1990's General Moters "bought" into a program to "protect the rain forest" sponsored by "The Nature Conservancy". End result is the Native people are banned from using their forests by armed police who are protecting the forest from the peoples who have lived there for hundreds of years. The mythical "Carbon Credits" represented by the trees, at a dollar a tree" are owned by General Motors who can use them to offset their polluting the air in the U, S, or sell them on the Carbon Credit Market. Sound familiar, In the U. S. the government declared that they owned the land from the Atlantic to the Pacific because god wished it. Then they gave or sold the new land to non-native people. This land became assets of "Land Banks" that created wealth that could be loaned to generate interest wealth. It is happening again in South America. Creating wealth with made-up Carbon Credits that become just another asset of the Bank.
tony says
08.25.11 // 02:05 PM
I'm not an american,but what does it say about a society that spends billions on weapons,but not a cent on helping native americans.

Join the conversation! First time contributing? View Comment Guidelines.



LIMIT 2,000 CHARACTERS